Peer-reviewer acknowledgements

Reviewer Acknowledgements

CONTRIBUTING REVIEWERS The editors of BMC Clinical Pathology would like to thank all of the reviewers who have contributed to the journal in volume 12 (2012).

Reviewer acknowledgements for 2013

The editors of BMC Medicine would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver

BMC Complementary and alternative medicine reviewer acknowledgements, 2014

Peer reviewer: what commitment is that?

The plight of the peer reviewer.

I read with interest the paper by Scheller et al., suggesting a better clinical outcome when patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting received an ionic contrast medium during the procedure than when non-ionic contrast media were used. These results are surprising since they completely disagree with the results of two randomized clinical trials comparing ionic and non-...